WELCOME to www.AnIndianMuslimViews.Blogspot.in - Your Window to the Indian Muslim World. ADVERTISE & REACH OUT to the WORLD!! AIMV Is Now Official Media Partner Major Urdu News Papers. FOR ADVERTISEMENT Just mail at anindianmuslimsviews@gmail.com *AIMV Website BEST VIEWED on Mozilla Firefox & Google Chrome!!!

:

Bangladeshis' life expectancy goes up.

Written By Unknown on Thursday, July 12, 2012 | 8:51 PM


Aided by his son Billal, Nurul Shikdar saws a tree in his village of Manda in Munshiganj. At 72, he is still active and refuses to retire. Average life expectancy in Bangladesh has gone up by 30 years since it became independent 41 years ago. [M. Jahan/Khabar]
Thanks to the wider availability of health care and nutritious food and a successful immunisation campaign, Bangladeshis are living longer than ever.

Nurul Shikdar should have stopped working long time ago. But at 72, he is remarkably agile and looks much younger than many of his peers in Bangladesh.
  • Aided by his son Billal, Nurul Shikdar saws a tree in his village of Manda in Munshiganj. At 72, he is still active and refuses to retire. Average life expectancy in Bangladesh has gone up by 30 years since it became independent 41 years ago. [M. Jahan/Khabar]

RELATED ARTICLES

The words rest or respite do not seem exist in his lexicon.
"I won't stop working until I go to the grave," Nurul told Khabar South Asia, taking a brief pause from sawing a tree with the aid of his son Billal at his village of Manda in Munshiganj, near Dhaka.
When asked the secret of his youthful vitality, Nurul replied sheepishly, "I've eaten only fresh vegetables and fish from Padma. Age could never touch me."
A father of five, Nurul defies expectations about aging in Bangladesh, where the official retirement age is 59 and anyone who reaches 60 is considered old.
But these days many people, like Nurul, remain active well past 60. Indeed, the life expectancy of Bangladeshis has gone up 30 years since the country gained independence 41 years ago.
According to official statistics, average life expectancy in 1971 was 39.93 years. It rose to 55.24 years in 1980 and to 60 in 1990. Published last year, the latest statistics show on average Bangladeshis now live up to 70 years of age.
"The primary reason for this success is the availability of affordable healthcare in most villages," Anup Kumar Saha, a professor at Sir Salimullah Medical College in Dhaka, told Khabar. Besides, he said, people have also become more health conscious than they were 40 years ago.
Advances against preventable diseases like diarrhoea, malaria, tuberculosis and cholera have also helped Bangladeshis live longer.
What has further boosted average life expectancy is the remarkable success of the Expanded Programme of Immunisation (EPI), which has sharply reduced child mortality in Bangladesh. According to a Health Ministry report published in 2011, the mortality rate for the under-five age group has decreased significantly – from 89 per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 47.8 in 2010.
Last year, official retirement age was extended by two years from 57 to 59, benefitting nearly a million government employees who can now earn two more years of income.
According to the 2011 World Bank report "Capitalising on the Demographic Transition: Tackling Noncommunicable Diseases in South Asia", the population of Bangladeshis aged 65 and older was 4.5% in 2000 and will rise to 6.6% in 2025.
Enhanced life expectancy is reaching all segments of the population, thanks in part to the greater availability of nutritious food.
"The widespread availability of nutritious food at an affordable price, changes in food habits and the expansion of the social safety net have largely benefited the poorer segment of the population," said AKM Nur-un-Nabi, a professor of population science at Dhaka University
Further, there is a direct correlation between life expectancy and poverty, he said. Bangladesh has proven that creating opportunities for the poor ultimately leads to better healthcare, nutrition and improved overall life expectancy.

Is it a sin to be a Muslim in Gujarat?


A Muslim  lady 's  ordeal in Modi's Gujarat

In  Gujarat, Muslims are still a discriminated lot even after 10 years after Godhra riots.This notion has again been proved by over zealous security check up at  Gandhinagar recently.

Muslims in Gujarat never tire of airing their resentment about the routine checking but the way investigating agencies are behaving the moment they see a person with a beard and a skull cap. This really hurts Muslims. This time a Muslim lady was victim  of being a Muslim.


She may not be a high-profile celebrity or a VVIP whose detention or frisking at an international airport would make headlines. But 40-year-old Zahira Ghoghari’s ordeal is no different, if not worse. She claims she was frisked and subjected to humiliation by security guards at Akshardham temple in Gandhinagar because she was a Muslim. 


Zahira has now written to Chief Minister Narendra Modi seeking an assurance from him that the issue will be dealt with sternly and her dignity upheld.


On May 17, 2012 she along with three children and a friend visited the temple complex around 12.30 pm. While her friend Nilofer and children were let in by security personnel at the entrance after a routine check, the 40-year-old did not gain an easy entry.


Called A ‘Suspect’


“Since I had covered my head with a dupatta, one of the woman guards looked at me suspiciously and asked me my name. When I told her my name was Zahira Ghogari and I was a Muslim, the attitude of the guards towards me changed. They grilled me for 20 minutes, asking me where I stayed and what my family background was. They were very rude. While other women were being let in without being frisked, I was cornered. Later, a woman guard took me to a nearby booth and frisked me. In fact she groped me and touched my private parts. When I resisted, she told me rather rudely that the guards had orders to check every suspect,” said Zahira.


Outraged at being called a ‘suspect’, she went to the security office and saw three guards seated there. When she told them she wanted to lodge a complaint, they were forthcoming initially.


“However, when they came to know that I was a Muslim, they turned hostile and dissuaded me by saying that physical checking was a routine process. When I refused to relent and demanded an explanation for the misconduct, a guard addressed as Mr Pathak by his colleagues told me, ‘Don’t ask us, go and ask Narendra Modi. He will tell you.’” said Zahira.
While she later joined her friend and children who were strolling on the premises, “unable to forget what had happened,” Zahira left the temple premises.


Nobody Ill-treats People at Ajmer Dargah


She says it was out of respect for all religions that she decided to take her loved ones to the temple, but what she went through was unforgettable. “It is out of respect and sadbhavna that people from different religions visit the temple. I know that security is a big concern. Even Ajmer dargah has witnessed a bloody terror attack. There too security is beefed up. But people are not discriminated against on the basis of religion and harassed. Is this how women ought to be treated?” says Zahira.


Zahira had visited Akshardham with her two children, friend Nilofer and her son on May 17, 2012.


Letter To CM


She writes: “Respected sir, I am a law abiding citizen and a proud Gujarati. Sir, my name is Zahira, I am a Muslim and I am not a terrorist. My husband is a builder and enjoys good reputation in the society. I understand it is important that the security personnel remain vigilant at places like Akshardham which has been attacked in the past. But members of a particular community being discriminated against and humiliated in the name of security should not be allowed. After all that I suffered, I am not sure whether I will gather courage to visit that temple again.”


She further adds, “Sir, I have been seeing you on TV and reading about your Sadbhavana mission. The mission had brought in a sense of security and rekindled hope in me and other members of my community, who continue to be  haunted by the painful memories of riots in which they lost their family members.”


“I believe that as long as security guards like Mr Pathak continue to humiliate visitors like me under the pretext of security check, your message of sadbhavana will not have any effect. It will seem like a vain political exercise,” writes Zahira.


Mentioning that she was neither a celebrity nor a VVIP whose frisking or brief questioning at an international airport, in a foreign country would create headlines, she adds, “I am a simple, law-abiding citizen of Gujarat. I want an assurance from you that my Gujarati pride will remain intact and will not be dented by insensitive and rude security personnel like Mr Pathak.’’


Zahira is hopeful she will not only receive a reply from the chief minister, but also get justice.
An official of Akshardham temple said on condition of anonymity, “We are deeply saddened by what has happened. According to Pramukh Swami, religion is propagation of love. We do not believe in discrimination. We are investigating the case to find out who is responsible for the misconduct. Action will be taken against the security personnel who misbehaved with Zahira.”


[Abdul Hafiz Lakhani is a senior Journalist based at Ahmedabad, Gujarat. He is associated with IndianMuslimObserver.com as Bureau Chief (Gujarat). He can be reached at lakhani63@yahoo.com or on his cell 09228746770]

Hijab is more than just a religious obligation.


By Nazia Jassim
The media usually salivates and greedily laps up stories of “Islam oppressed me, but now I'm liberated! Let's celebrate!” by women who choose to give up religion. Which is what made the Open Page article, “Under the veil, we are free souls!'' (April 22, 2012) by Jumana Haseen Rahim, a pleasant surprise. While the Taslima Nasreens of the world hog the limelight with their views and definitions of freedom, it is rare that Muslim women, with conflicting views on women's liberation, are given a chance to voice their thoughts. However, while Jumana's article speaks out against labelling women in hijab (veil), it does not explain why many Muslim women feel so passionately about the hijab.
As an educated woman in her early twenties who chooses to wear her religious convictions on her sleeve by practising hijab, I have been subjected to animosity, and worse — pity, from feminists and those who cannot fathom the reasons behind my choice. While I can attribute hurtful, anti-Muslim slurs to narrow-mindedness and bigotry, the assumption made by the educated, so-called forward-thinkers, that we are all oppressed girls whose lifestyles are dictated by the men in their lives, is both frustrating and demeaning.
Hijab is more than just a religious obligation. People need to realise that, in its own right, it symbolises liberty. It gives women the freedom to show male strangers only the parts of the body that they wish them to see. Yes, the simplesalwar kameez and kurti do come under the category of ‘modest' clothing. But if men want to objectify women, hijab just makes things harder for them. I would even go so far as to call it the ultimate feminist statement. A Muslim woman's definition of empowerment is being judged by her personality alone, leaving her looks to be appreciated only by those who matter. To those who refer to theburkha as a “medieval garb,” I ask: Why is it that a nun wearing a similar robe is looked upon with respect, while a woman in a burkha is labelled as ‘backward'?
Jumana's article has received a mixed response. While many agree that it all comes down to personal choice, others raise the valid point that many Muslim girls are compelled to wear burkhas. Having been born into an educated, open-minded family which has kept me aware of my rights as a woman, it is especially painful to hear stories of Muslim girls being forced into burkhas, being deprived of their rights and being made to conform to norms set by misguided men. But can anyone name ONE religion in which patriarchy hasn't reared its ugly head?
The niqab (face-covering) raises questions about its being not just a threat to security, but also the cause for a woman's identity to ‘fade away'. A woman who wears the veil is obligated to reveal her identity whenever security demands it — in airports, in banks and in court, and she is fully aware of that.
As for the danger of her losing her identity, it must be understood that the face-veil is worn only when she steps out of her home. It is not worn in front of other women, as well as close male relatives. If only male strangers lose out on the chance of seeing a woman's face, I fail to comprehend how that constitutes the loss of her identity.
Crimes against Muslim women cannot be attributed to Islam as a religion. Islam was the first to give women the right to own property, to divorce and to remarry (rights that were won by women of other religions only after fighting for them). In order to prevent girl babies being associated with burden, Muslim women are the ones who can ask dowries of their husbands. Islam doesn't oppress women. Men oppress women. The reasons behind the exploitation of women in all religions and communities are the same: women being kept in the dark about their rights, and patriarchal, skewed interpretations of the religious text.
(The writer's email ID is nazia.j@gmail.com)

Stop harassment of innocent Muslim by police.

Written By Unknown on Wednesday, July 11, 2012 | 10:13 PM


Civil society members in Lucknow have demanded government to take effective measures to put a check on incidents of harassment of innocent Muslim youths by police, anti-terror squad and intelligence agencies on the false terror charges. The demand was made after a 'public hearing' in which several Muslim youth, who were allegedly victimised and harassed by security agencies, narrated their tale of woes before people.

Shaukat Ali, a teacher and resident of Pratapgarh. claimed that he was being harassed by security agencies since August 2008. Though, he said, he has been questioned several times by the police, no proof has been given so far. But, he added, the questioning by police has made him a 'suspect' in the eyes of his students and neighbours, leading to humiliation.He had lodged complaint with higher authorities but nothing happened so far.

Mohammad Shahdab, from Azamgarh, claimed that he nephew and son were falsely implicated in terror charges. Other victims claimed that they were being branded as agents of various terror organisations by the security agencies without any proof. They also claimed that police demands money while threatening to put them in jail. Police detains Muslim youth for questioning without following procedure laid down in law, they added.

Former Indian police services officer SR Darapuri, after the hearing, said that it seems that police and security agencies are working for saffron organisations. Former vice-chancellor of Lucknow University Prof RR Verma said that the media should exercise restrain while projecting a person as terror only on the statement of security agencies because often accused are acquitted for want of evidence but adverse publicity makes thier life hell.

S M Naseem, another Former Indian Police Service officer, said that security agencies round up innocent people on false charges for awards and promotion. Lawer Mohammed Shoeb, who is fighting cases of Muslim youths facing terror charges, said even after acquittal, youth are seen with suspicion by the society, spoiling their career.The activists demanded compensation for victims and action against officers responsible for harassment.
News by: TOI

The issue of Conversion in India.


Union Minister Jairam Ramesh speaks to his heart and he has mastered the art of calling spade a spade. He even invites some controversy unwillingly because of his nature. Recently, he addressed a gathering of bishops, fathers, catholic nuns in a golden jubilee celebration of Caritas India, an organization which claims of working for the rehabilitation of people affected from natural calamities.

He stressed on the need to respect ‘Lakshman Rekha’ by Church sponsored organizations active in various parts of country. The ,inister even invited Caritas to play an active role in the development of naxal affected regions. He even said that his apt comment with regards to Caritas was not for catholic organization rather it was for Caritas as a social organization.
Jairam Ramesh praised the positive role played by Ramkrishna Mission in the Narainpur district of Chhattisgarh. He said that Caritas India can work hand in glove with Rural Affairs Ministry. But, they should avoid conversion related activities.

The very next day news from Kashmit Valley vindicates a similar dimension of ‘Lakshman Rekha’. A local Shariayat court gave a verdict of ‘No-Entry’ for Pastor C M Khanna, Ghayoorr Messiah, Chandrakanta Khanna, and Father Jim Bhorst. A local court has also told them that the church schools should provide Islamic education to students. There were allegation of conversion of Muslim youths on C M Khanna, father of Srinagar based All India Centre Church. He was also sent to jail under section 153 (A) & 295(A). These sections are applicable on destroying harmony between two communities.

The general sentiment in the valley has turned against Christian missionary schools. Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, leader of liberal camp of Hurriyat Conference with the help of maulvis and other influential Islamic leaders established ‘Tahaffuj-e-Islam’ to fight such anti-Islamic forces. They termed missionary schools as a hub of conversion related activities and even demanded for complete ban on any education which goes against basic tenets of Islamic principles. Kashmiri leadership always keeps alert ears on conversion. Few years ago, Church had to give proper justification after a report published in English newspaper. But, this time matter has taken serious turn. As news emanating from valley, some of the separatist leaders have even tried to forge a unity between Gilani and Mirwaiz on the issue of conversion. They have agreed to work together on this issue.

Peter Celestine Elampassery, Bishop of Catholic Archdiocese and Bishop P K Samantaroy from church of North India (CNI) Amritsar diocese have requested government to intervene in the matter. Population of Christians in the valley is feeble whereas some population exists in Kathua region of Jammu. Few years ago, in a documentary titled ‘In the search of self-respect’ broadcast by Prasar Bharti has exposed the sorry state of converted Christians in India. There has not been much change in their life even after conversion. Most of them are working as low-paid sanitation employees. On the other hand Church in the region owns huge resources.

The comments of Jairam Ramesh assume serious significance in this regard. Union and state governments are quite eager to use these resources for the welfare of people. Nobody in India has any objection regarding welfare activities of Church. But, problem starts the moment it interferes with other faith under the garb of welfare. Indian constitution allows everybody to follow his or her belief. It also allows propagation of the religion. But, it does not allow attack on other religion. There is a thin line between welfare activities and conversion. This thin line is called ‘Lakshman Rekha’. 

Church has immensely grown in tribal regions. Those tribes which adopted Christianity have distanced themselves from parent tribes. Now, their relationships are on the verge of termination. Hostility has replaced bonhomie among them. And the result is: Gruesome murder of Graham Stains and his two innocent children and violence in Kandhamal. Even Supreme Court has warned on crossing the Lakshman Rekha.

Church is trying to create favorable work atmosphere in the naxal affected areas. An article published in an English daily dated June 7, 2010 indicated about this motive. The article was written by spokesperson of Delhi Catholic Archdiocese. The article subtly gave credit of all the good work done in North-East to Church and requested RSS to create positive atmosphere for development.

RSS and Church are two organizations that have immense reach in the far-flung tribal regions. They have organized structure and have active volunteers. RSS has consistently opposed conversion in the tribal region. Few years ago, when Jharkhand governor had made a plan to distribute food-grains for BPL people and the onus was handed to Church. This had created furor in the state and government had to retreat from this decision. Not only Hindus even Muslims and Sikhs have opposed the conversion. After Minakshipuram incident Muslim conversion has subdued. But, Christian missionaries are still active on this front. Despite growth in Christian population, the Dalit Christians are unhappy because of the Church attitude.

A national magazine has revealed the systematic game-plan of Conversion by Church. More than 4,000 missionary groups are active in India and they are active in creating fertile ground for conversion. One percent population of Christians in Tripura has reached to 13,000. The growth in population is more than 90 percent.

Conversion severely affects culture, language and social structure. In Central Asia conversion is now political issue. Even Islam favours conversion, but the pace with which Christianity is expanding is quite amazing. Demographic figures change world and religious conflicts makes the matter worse for the humankind.

[Writer R.L. Francis is President of Poor Christian Liberation Movement (PCLM). He can be contacted at pclmfrancis@gmail.com]

India's Muslims survive a downturn in growth?


Signs that India's economic engine is slowing have made for unwelcome news across the country. For Muslims, however, the trend is particularly worrisome, as their community has been lagging behind even in prosperous times.

India's Muslim population is the world's second-largest, after Indonesia, and accounts for around 13% of all citizens. But a landmark 2006 report, released by the government-appointed Rajinder Sachar Committee, found they have significantly lower educational levels, incomes and job prospects.

Sharp disparities remained even as India enjoyed several consecutive years of robust growth over the past decade. But the global economic downturn stalled the momentum, and this month Reserve Bank of India Governor Duvvuri Subbarao acknowledged publicly that the "potential for India's economic growth has come down".

Last month, the government confirmed that the growth rate had slumped to just 6.5% between April 2011 and March 2012, compared to 8.4% year-over-year for the same time period.


Between January and March, the economy stagnated at just 5.3% compared to 9.4% for the same period last year. What's worse the industrial sector, regarded as the biggest job generator, reported negative growth.

"Mr Subbarao's statement, read in conjunction with those coming from the finance ministry, reflects the serious setback that India has received in its dream of being a global economic power," the government's chief economic adviser, Kaushik Basu, told Khabar South Asia.

Belt-tightening puts affirmative action at risk

With the prospect of austerity measures looming for India as a whole, Muslims are bracing for the impact. According to a political leader whose party swept into power in Uttar Pradesh two months ago with wide support from the Muslim community, there is a growing sense of vulnerability.

"Austerity always hits the poorest of the poor, and repeated government-sponsored studies have shown that India's Muslims belong to that bracket," Shahid Siddiqui, a senior Samajwadi Party leader, told Khabar.

"Even without austerity they suffered poor representation in organised sector jobs, and their traditional occupations were hit hard by competition from Chinese imports," he said.
Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)) leader and eight-term member of Parliament Hannan Mollah said programmes to lift the community out of poverty are at risk.

"The slowdown is sure to lead to cutbacks in government projects, especially those attuned to minority needs," Mollah said. Improving minority prospects, he said, depends on grants, microfinance programmes and "soft loans", that is, low-interest loans provided by the government at low interest rates.

"In an austerity situation, these may be hit," he said.

Asaduddin Owaisi, a prominent Muslim leader from the southern city of Hyderabad, sees a "dwindling share of Muslims in the Indian economy".

"The global economic slowdown, compounded by the eurozone crisis, will hit India's export sector hard," Owaisi told Khabar. "Muslims make up a sizeable chunk of the export sector's workforce, and if these firms lose markets abroad, Muslims will lose jobs."

Government committed to moving forward

The administration of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh insists it is still committed to closing the gap. It points to concrete steps taken during its tenure, starting with the Sachar report.
Singh was in his second year of power when he asked former Judge Rajinder Sachar to lead a committee tasked with providing empirical evidence of the economic deprivation of Muslims.

When the committee's report found that Muslims hold a disproportionately low share (5%) of public sector jobs, the government decided to take urgent action, introducing quotas and other measures.

Salman Khursheed, Minister for Minorities Welfare, is proud of the work the government has done.

"The last three years saw a significant rise in government recruitment of minorities," he told Khabar. "Our intervention led to a steady increase in the number of Muslims in government jobs. From less than 5% in 2005, it went up to 8.3% in 2008 and 9.24% in 2010."

Whether the Singh administration's track record will be enough to reassure Muslim voters in turbulent times is in doubt, however. During the Uttar Pradesh election Singh's Congress Party pulled out all the stops in an effort to gain support from this key constituency, accounting for 22% of the state population.

Instead, Muslims largely deserted Congress for the Samajwadi Party, which says it will do a better job of safeguarding their interests.

(Courtesy: By Udayan Namboodiri, Khabar South Asia)

Qazi means Marriage Registrar: AIMPLB


All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) will demand the status of government marriage registrars for Qazis (who solemnize nikah for Muslims) in their executive committee (EC) meeting scheduled on July 15. The demand has gained momentum after the Supreme Court passed a verdict for compulsory registration of all marriages.

As per the board members, compulsory registration with government is an encroachment upon the Islamic Shariah. AIMPLB spokesperson, SQR Ilyas said, We have no reservation about marriage registration. In fact, these are done among Muslims since ages. There is a complete record available with the Qazis in different districts who solemnise nikah." He is also the convener of the board's internal committee that monitors the issue of compulsory marriage registration.

Illyas opined that compulsory registration of marriages with the government will cause trouble to poor Muslims. He said, Compulsory registration will create confusion and social problems for marriages which have taken place in the past. Hence, the only solution is to give status of marriage registrar to the Qazis.''

The 51-member EC will also consider various decisions given by different courts across the country in light of the Muslim Women Maintenance Act. "Many decisions are not in sync with the Islamic Shariah. A committee has been formed to review these decisions,'' said Ilyas.

One of the issues that will be discussed is 'fixing the responsibility of maintenance on the husband even after the mandatory period of iddat (three months)'. Islamic law fixes no responsibility on the man after the three months period as the female can re-marry. Ilyas said, There have been instances where the court has asked the man to pay maintenance. We will discuss it.''

(Courtesy: The Times of India)

Muslim women: hidden or exposed !?


The Islamic culture of segregation of sexes was based on early marriages that sought to curtail sexual frustration, but economic pressures and evolving social attitudes are rapidly changing this tradition.

Those living in urban areas, particularly the educated middle class, are in their 30s when they get married – and until then, they are expected to live celibate lives. However, it does not seem to work, particularly as the society opens up with the passage of time.

More and more women are coming out of their sheltered places. There are girls’ schools and colleges in every city, town and even in big villages. Thousands of women go out to work every day. So the chances of unmarried men and women meeting each other are stronger now than ever before, which is shifting social and moral attitudes slowly but surely. Until the 1960s, it was common to see veiled women in the cities. In many Islamic countries, such as Pakistan, it has become as less common sight.

This mixing of sexes is not always “benign” as most Muslims would like to believe. Many Muslim men claim to have had more than one affair before their marriage. Most of these affairs, they claim, are platonic but many also acknowledge having sex before marriage and not many have recourse to prostitution. So who are their partners?

If you suggest that they have been intimate with girls from their neighbourhoods, schools and work-places, they get offended. “Our girls? Never. They never do such things,” is the usual answer. This has created a strange attitude toward women. Most men want women before they are married but are reluctant to acknowledge it.

It is considered wrong to express your desires to a woman. But not many hesitate to touch, pinch or even grope a woman when walking in a busy street or bazaar. Rubbing hands against a woman’s body is so common in most Muslim cities that there probably is no woman who has never been rubbed or touched. Some men even try to put their hands inside her veil.

If a man is caught doing this he is beaten, often badly. But if he is not caught, he boasts about his exploits in the bazaar with a sense of pride, like a hunter discussing his successes. There are few who condemn such behaviour, but the same people would very enthusiastically join in beating one of their ‘kind’ if he is caught in the act.

Sometimes Muslims also can be very expressive, very open. Sex is not something you discuss in public but nobody stops the quack doctors and the itinerant sex experts from doing so on the roadside. The expert describes every action and every gesture in vivid detail, often with the help of Western sex magazines. And nobody seems to mind.

It is bad for a woman to show her body in public, so she has to be properly covered when she goes out. A young woman is not even supposed to buy her own under-garments until she is old. Before that, the shopping is done by her husband if she is married or by her mother or grandmother if she is single.

But it is not bad for a shopkeeper to display the same goods. Some stores love to display bras. I have never seen so many bras, in all colours and sizes, displayed from every angle, outside the Muslim world. They stare at you from store windows. Sometimes they festoon the store doorway.

Such displays are more than a mere device to sell the merchandise. Often it is an expression of the store owner’s sexuality or perhaps an attempt to lure a male customer into the shop. Youngsters can be seen staring wide-eyed at the forbidden goods. They often go inside for a closer look and end up buying something else to justify the visit.

Television and newspaper advertisements are full of sexual innuendos. Sometimes women can be seen promoting even exclusively male objects, such as a razor blade or an after-shave. When it comes to appreciating female beauty, Muslims are partial to blondes.

Fashion models in the Islamic world have mastered the art of exposing everything – while at the same time keeping a token cover-up. The qameez or the sari never slips but they can show all the curves and contours.

All this hide-and-seek has made women extremely vulnerable. They are no more the objects behind the veil that they used to be. They are no more protected from the male eyes by the four-walls and the thick curtains that separated their world from that of the men. Yet at the same time they are not allowed to come out and live with confidence.

This half-hidden and half-exposed woman gets neither the respect the Muslim culture claims to give her, nor the economic strength the opportunity to come out and work for a living provides her. She is no longer a traditional Muslim, and therefore, does not enjoy the protection her position behind the veil automatically provided her. And neither is she a fully liberated worker, like those in the West, and therefore lacks the confidence that economic freedom brings.

How does a woman feel living in such an environment?

When I saw M. K., she was playing with clay. With a pair of restless hands she would separate a piece from a lump lying on her table, shape it up, make a figure and flatten it, only to reshape it, make another and flatten it again. I watched her quietly for a few minutes and then asked her why she was doing that.

“I like playing with clay. It is so soft, so gentle, changes shape so easily. But despite its adaptability it has a definite character,” she said.

M was one of five young women artists who were exhibiting their work at a gallery in Islamabad. It was their first major exhibition and they were all excited. These were young, educated, self-confident and forward-looking women who wanted to “come out and make our contribution to developing the place where we are born,” as one of them said.

Four of the five girls had spent four years learning creative art. Now they were graduating with an intention to go out and make their mark. Before coming here, four of them studied journalism and psychology. The fifth, A. M., was a senior student and already had participated in several exhibitions.

“What does the future hold for you?” I asked one of the graduating students.

“Anything I want. Things have changed now. Ours is not the first group of girls graduating from a school or a college in Pakistan. There are hundreds of thousands of educated women in this country. Many are working outside their homes. There are women in the judiciary, in police, in engineering and at senior positions in the bureaucracy. We now even have women pilots. So I think the time has come for men to stop worrying about our future. We can take care of ourselves,” she said.

All the women said they had a strong desire to communicate with others through their work. When asked why they had not chosen journalism after studying it, they said they did not find words strong enough to communicate their feelings and so they went for a stronger medium.
N. S. is a painter. She paints portraits that are not portraits because she masks the faces of her subjects. When I asked her why, she said: “I want the viewers to try and see the real face behind the mask without removing it. It is important that we learn to do that.”

She said most people hide behind something to cover their real faces. “They carry several masks with them. One is for their family, another for their friends, one for their colleagues and yet another for their bosses. They keep changing the masks according to the occasion. To understand these people you have to unmask them, layer by layer, and then perhaps you can see their real faces.”

N uses bright colours. “People prefer to show the brighter side of their personalities. But I use the mask to expose their dark side, too,” she said.

P.M. is a sculptor. She creates female figures. One of her women is shown drowning in a whirlpool. “This is the whirlpool of race, colour, creed and religion. We are all drowning in it,” she said. She also was displaying caged women: some totally trapped in their cages, others at the brink of freedom.

She said she had distorted their faces and twisted their figures to show “how lack of freedom distorts a human being.”

P comes from a family that placed no restrictions on her. She was free to do what she wanted to. “Yet I want more freedom. I want to be free of all ties, emotional or physical.” She selected sculpture because of its “three-dimensional affect and also because it gives me more freedom to express myself.”

A Malik was also a sculptor but different from P. Her figures were tender, more feminine. They had all the curves of a female body but the faces were covered in veils. Those not wearing veils had no faces. “I am not displaying veiled figures. It is not their faces that they are hiding, it is their fears,” she said.

Fears of what? “Perhaps my women are afraid of the society, perhaps of masked men and the bearded priest or maybe they are afraid of themselves. Don’t ask me. Look around and you will find the answer,” she said.

M. A. was different from all others. Her paintings had an Islamic touch. In one of her works the “kalima” or the Muslim declaration of faith was shown emerging from behind an abstraction of lines and curves. Domes and minarets dominated her other paintings.

She does not see a conflict between the past and the present. “What we are now is because of what we were yesterday,” she said. “We are Muslims and we can’t deny that. Similarly, we also can’t deny that we live in today’s world.”

She said she was completely at ease with “what we are” and did not see the need to “act out an alien culture.”

Women are always at ease with themselves. The problem is some men are not at ease at all when there are women around. Will they ever learn to accept women as they are?

(Courtesy: By Anwar Iqbal Dawn, Pakistan)

ISLAM: Simple philosophy with complicated commonsense.


Islam is as simple as philosophy and as complicated as commonsense.

They say in Persian: Shud pareeshaa(n) khwaab-e man az kasrat-e ta‘beerhaa (my dream got spoilt by so many interpretations), and it sums up the case of Islam very well. Maybe our ta‘beer of Islam is complicated while Islam is in fact quite philosophical i.e. very simple. Islam will be complicated when we will consider “interpretation of Sharee‘ah laws or Hadeeth or Fatwas or Personal laws or matters dealing with madrasas” as “religious” and matters like “Muslim educational institutions, or reservation for Muslims in educational institutions and jobs, or the need to address the community’s socioeconomic and educational uplift, or the political situation of the community, or the civil liberties, or the situation of Muslim women” as “non-religious”. And we will do so with utmost self-confidence and with no room for second-thoughts.

Islam is a ‘way of life’ – very simple. It sounds complicated because it is divorced from life. It gives a direction and greater sense to all that we do. Without it we will not be able to satisfactorily reason any higher purposes of our actions. It gives the complete answer. If I were to meet Charles Darwin I would ask him, “Thanks a lot for taking the pain of explaining to us where we have come from. Kindly tell us more about the origin of species and how the fittest survive. After having done the above, please do one more favour and tell us what are we supposed to do on this earth and what is our ultimate objective and destination – after having successfully evolved from all the named and unnamed species”. If, however, we settle down for an incomplete answer then the simplicity of Islam will elude us.

Islam guides the human beings in every aspect of life with its beautiful principles – without dividing it into the categories of “religious” and “non-religious” or Deeni and Dunyaawi. You divorce it from life and it will become extremely complicated. It will become difficult to understand and explain. Because it will not have a frame reference. It will lose the ground which is where it was supposed to be standing. When you keep it in suspended animation it will not be itself. It will certainly complicate the situation. When we hear a lecture dealing only with what is beneath the earth or above the heavens we are certainly going to say, “Islam is really complicated, my friend”.

Islam does not make the lawful unlawful and the unlawful lawful. It is between fisq (transgression) and rahbaaniyyah (monasticism). Islam is not about speeding when the signal is red. It is not about remaining stationary even when the signal is green. (For an assessment of the current situation we only need to ask a few people about the percentage of Halaal and Haraam in Islam and then analyze the answers.) This is what is meant by the ‘middlemostness’ (wasatiyyah), which is inherent to Islam. As soon as we utter ‘Islam’ it immediately implies wasatiyyah. This is the ‘bi-polarity’ of Islam which combines the East and the West (soul and body) – seamlessly. If, however, we do not combine the two despite believing in Oneness then Islam will certainly be complicated.

Islam and truth are one and the same thing. If instead of walking all the way to the truth we start urging the truth to follow our path it will not remain simple anymore. Because it will not remain truth anymore. An incomplete truth is anything but truth. Ek bhi harf ahtaanay ki nahee(n) gunjaa’ish! Truth has never been complicated. Our perception of Islam has, in fact, been partial and distorted. Truth is not easily recognized due to the conditioning effects of generations after generations. Hence, truth has become extremely “complicated” and highly “philosophical”.

Islam is a religion of common humanity. It is as simple for that humanity as air, light and water within everyone’s reach and satisfying everyone’s need in all walks of life (whether public or private). If it remained like that it was simple. But it has become a private affair. Becoming a private affair and a matter of personal preference, it has immediately become complicated. Now it is so complicated that we don’t know in which aspects of our life we can refer to this manual and in which situations there isn’t any need, in fact! In many a matters of life it is obviously non-applicable!! Being applicable at one time and non-applicable at another and a constant switching between the two is a sure recipe for making it complicated.

For commonsense to become common and for philosophy to become simple we will have to change our discourse. We will have to redefine the terminologies which we frequently use in a borrowed sense. We are not going to use new words for a change in the discourse. We are only going to assign new meanings to the already existing words. Or more correctly, to regain the lost meanings. If we do not do so, Islam will not become as simple as philosophy and as complicated as commonsense.

[Wasim Ahmad is Department Head of Islamic Studies, Preston University, Ajman, UAE. He can be contacted at malikwasimahmad@gmail.com or +971505363235]

Views @Image

smile Islamic banking smile Conversion smile Muslim Personal Law
free counters
 
Support : Creating Website | Indian Muslim | Indian Muslim | Indian Muslim | Indian Muslim | Indian Muslim | Indian Muslim
Copyright © 2011. Indian Muslim's Views - All Rights Reserved
Template Modify by Indian Muslim Inspired Indian Muslim
Proudly powered by Indian Muslim